Big thanks to "daniel dot eckl at gmx dot de" but i have to change his config, because it doesn't work (may be wrong syntax).
I have add only this string to VirtualHost config and it works.
php_admin_value open_basedir /www/site1/
Now all php scripts are locked in the directory.
Installé en tant que module Apache
Lorsque PHP est compilé en tant que module Apache, ce module hérite des permissions accordées à l'utilisateur faisant tourner Apache (par défaut, l'utilisateur "nobody"). Cela à plusieurs impacts sur la sécurité et les autorisations. Par exemple, si vous utilisez PHP pour accéder à une base de données, à moins que la base n'ait un système de droits d'accès interne, vous devrez rendre la base accessible à l'utilisateur "nobody". Cela signifie qu'un script mal intentionné peut accéder à la base, la modifier sans identification. Il est aussi possible qu'un robot accède à la page d'administration, et détruise toutes les pages. Vous devez aussi protéger vos bases de données avec les autorisations Apache, ou définir votre propre modèle d'accès avec LDAP, .htaccess, etc. et inclure ce code dans tous vos scripts : PHP.
Souvent, lorsqu'on a établi les droits de l'utilisateur PHP (ici, l'utilisateur Apache) pour minimiser les risques, on s'aperçoit que PHP ne peut plus écrire de virus dans les fichiers des utilisateurs. Ou encore, modifier une base de données privée. Il est aussi incapable de modifier des fichiers qu'il devrait pouvoir modifier, ou effectuer certaines transactions.
Une erreur fréquente de sécurité est de donner à l'utilisateur Apache les droits de superadministrateur ou d'améliorer les possibilités d'Apache d'une autre façon.
Donner de telles permissions à l'utilisateur Apache est extrêmement dangereux, et peut compromettre tout le système, telle que l'utilisation des sudo ou du chroot. Pour les novices de la sécurité, une telle utilisation est à exclure d'office.
Il existe des solutions plus simples. En utilisant open_basedir vous pouvez contrôler et restreindre l'accès à certains dossiers qui pourront être utilisés par PHP. Vous pouvez aussi créer des aires de restrictionsApache, pour restreindre les activités anonymes liées aux internautes.
Installé en tant que module Apache
14-Aug-2008 08:41
30-Sep-2005 10:56
I'm running Windows version of Apache with php as module. System is Windows XP Service Pack 2 on NTFS filesystem. To avoid potential security problems, I've set Apache to run under NT AUTHORITY\Network Service account, and there is only one directory, named Content, with Full Access for this account. Other directories are either not accessible at all or with readonly permissions (like %systemroot%)... So, even if Apache will be broken, nothing would happen to entire system, because that account doesn't have admin privilegies :)
01-Mar-2004 08:21
There is a safe way to support a lot of users in a secure way, without having to use CGI, in a way which is probebly faster
than mod_php.
Use FastCGI, with the SuExecWrapper set to your suid wrapper. It means every user wil get his own program-group, with processes
which are being reused. If the numer of processes that is being
started on startup is 0, then the processgroup for a user will be generated when needed.
This means: The first page is slow, after that the Zend Engine caching kicks in. When the load on the virtualhost reduces, the
processes wil die off, and extra processes for a user-process-group
will only be started when (again) needed.
Your apache will be a LOT! lichter, because it won't have to drag all
the php-memory overhead with it. This means static content is
faster, and the whole system uses less memory.
The PHP itself also won't need to drag along the apache overhead.
If for one reason or the other php craches, your apache will simple
start some new php-processes. If you want to upgrade/patch php,
you can simple create the new fastcgi binary, and after testing, you can simple update the system by copying it, and maybe doing a
'apachectl gracefull'
In short : Sepparating distinct functions in different processes
communicating useing IPC methodes can be very good
for performance and security. The best example of this
principle at work is Postfix, where every process runs
chroot() under its own uid.
http://wiki.openisis.org/i/view/Php/HowtoFastCgi
30-Apr-2003 10:16
Additional CAUTION to anyone trying Pollux's solution:
It's kind a good. Probably works right. I think I'll give it a try myself. BUT...
its safe ONLY on the assumption that apache is 100% CLEAN. (codes and confs.) Any flaws on apache, almost ANYTHING could happen to ALL users -precisely, web users. (Because apache is a member of ALL -again, web user's- GID.) So, leeps's hint should be one of the important things.
There is nothing close to perfect. What I wrote is just one thing you'll have to keep in mind. So, consider carefully BEFORE you try this solution. (Well, this applies to any other solutions though...)
10-Mar-2003 10:59
@pollux: additionally, tell your users to set their file-permissions to
- r-- (group) for files
- --x (group) for directories.
this disables the webserver to browse user's directory. if you don't know the filename, you cannot open it, e.g. by running malicious php-code through one of the users scripts.
08-Aug-2002 08:16
There is a better solution than starting every virtual host in a seperate instance, which is wasting ressources.
You can set open_basedir dynamically for every virtual host you have, so every PHP script on a virtual host is jailed to its document root.
Example:
<VirtualHost www.example.com>
ServerName www.example.com
DocumentRoot /www-home/example.com
[...]
<Location />
php_admin_value open_basedir \ "/www-home/example.com/:/usr/lib/php/"
</Location>
</VirtualHost>
If you set safe_mode on, then the script can only use binaries in given directories (make a special dir only with the binaries your customers may use).
Now no user of a virtual host can read/write/modify the data of another user on your machine.
Windseeker
